Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:01:38 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy <kip@lyris.com> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: remy@synx.com, bmilekic@dsuper.net, julian@whistle.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.05.9911180858370.24740-100000@luna> In-Reply-To: <199911181535.HAA15679@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FreeBSD has used wakeup_one() for this purpose since I wrote wakeup_one(). > In fact, it was the main reason I wrote it. Shortly after doing this the Apache > Group changed to using file locking to coordinate access to the socket and It may not be understanding the dialog correctly, but it seems like optimizing FreeBSD for a poorly architected web server, however widely used, is a sub-optimal allocation of effort. -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.05.9911180858370.24740-100000>