Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:09:00 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: printing of uint64_t in the kernel
Message-ID:  <20030103090900.B8517@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030103175514.H901-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de>; from brandt@fokus.gmd.de on Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 06:00:04PM %2B0100
References:  <20030103175514.H901-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
>=20
> 2. cast always to uintmax_t and use %ju.

This is correct.

> The first possibilities seems wrong, because one should not include a
> non-system header, the second because given a (hypothetical) machine with
> 128-bit uintmax_t this would incure a useless overhead. So what?

The overhead of an integer conversion is going to be lost in the
overhead of doing the printf.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+FcOqXY6L6fI4GtQRAnoHAKC49J62vAwZog3EQRkxOVADtj9OQACfcAqD
PR8gKk3O1LKJJve+lotWR/w=
=jgln
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030103090900.B8517>