Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:29:58 +0400 From: "Artem Tepponen" <temik@egartech.com> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: <rsi@panix.com>, "Doug Barton" <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, <arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <5235EF9BAE6B7F4CB3735789EEF73B296E614C@turtle.egar.egartech.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Terry Lambert [mailto:tlambert2@mindspring.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:08 PM > Artem Tepponen wrote: > > Unfortunately this doesn't solve third party packages problem well. > > Note: ports do have freebsd maintainers but packages may not (well, > > there should be possibility for standalone thirdparty packages). >=20 > It doesn't solve the third party binary only kernel components > problem, either. 8-). Hmm, I guess this problem won't be solved by packages system only 8-) Stable binary APIs is not a strong side of open source projects.... Artem Tepponen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5235EF9BAE6B7F4CB3735789EEF73B296E614C>