Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:54:46 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@iowna.com>, "Person, Roderick" <personrp@ccbh.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IEEE Journalist looking for facts about Microsoft use of BSDcode Message-ID: <20010622135446.A57186@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106201557120.6278-100000@cody.jharris.com>; from nick@rogness.net on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 04:01:11PM -0500 References: <3B30F8EE.FA429E8A@iowna.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106201557120.6278-100000@cody.jharris.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 20 June 2001 at 16:01:11 -0500, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Bill Moran wrote: > >> "Person, Roderick" wrote: >>> >>> I searched for "California" on a NT machine and found the same. >> > >> My question would be: Does a search for "FreeBSD" yield anything? Code >> developed specifically for FreeBSD should say "Copyright FreeBSD >> Project" and not have the word "California" in it anywhere. > > FreeBSD carries the BSD licence, hence the Regents of the > University of "California". But I did search it again for FreeBSD > and nothing as I would expect. There's no reason to believe that Microsoft has included FreeBSD code anywhere in their software. The issue was BSD, not FreeBSD. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010622135446.A57186>