Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:52:53 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org, Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Subject: Re: Import of tcsh into src/contrib/, replacing src/usr.bin/csh Message-ID: <XFMail.000416005253.darius@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20000415095048.D87742@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15-Apr-00 Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >>I think 'default shell for a "user"' is a very weak argument since when >>you make an account (with pw, vipw, sysinstall, etc) you can trivially >>change the shell.. I don't give new users sh, its umm, yucky :) > Then according to your own statement, you would have to visit ports > first before even giving your users a choice. Which in turns supports > the fact that having either csh or tcsh in the base system is not the > way to go. True, but this has nothing to do with the fact that I would like tcsh to be the default shell when I freshly install FreeBSD. I would settle for a knob in sysinstall which did it :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000416005253.darius>