Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:13:41 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc shlib version Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001113080440.20118A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20001113025326.A79642@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:44:17AM -0500, Daniel M. Eischen wrote: > > > > Why not find what was added and back it out? > > Why loose the functionality. Bumping a shared version isn't that big a > deal. It hasn't been shown that functionality would be lost. If it can't be worked around and functionality is lost, then I agree -- leave it in. > > > Aren't we going to need yet another version bump for 5.0? > > -current libc will have to be bumped at the same time it is in RELENG_4 > as they are current at the same value. I mean when 5.0 is released. There's bound to be more changes that require another version bump. Wasn't it dg who was waiting to add some changes to libc requiring a version bump? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1001113080440.20118A-100000>