Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:05:24 -0400 From: Matteo Riondato <matteo@FreeBSD.org> To: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> Cc: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: <822F9D2B-A82F-4765-8765-6604F9F79CBC@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <aO-6w2DbInwIupkH@amaryllis.le-fay.org> References: <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost> <aO-QglIdge2VetmF@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org> <aO-TUeDnFPOS6Pds@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <89861E7A-64C7-47CB-89F6-A93AB14813FF@FreeBSD.org> <aO-ZME6G4MbN-0c6@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <3E63F63B-0C90-43E2-BF55-30310B7599D3@FreeBSD.org> <aO-iGGTAFqRTZ8vv@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com> <aO-6w2DbInwIupkH@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Oct 15, 2025, at 11:16 AM, Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > Roger Marquis wrote in = <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com>: >> I think most of us would define a minimal jail >=20 > again -- i appreciate this is not very clear from the package name -- > the "minimal-jail" set is not "a minimal jail". it is the "minimal" > set, i.e. the set of packages required for a basic multi-user UNIX > system, but without packages which don't work in a jail. Would calling it =E2=80=9Cbasic-jail=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cstandard-jail=E2= =80=9D (terms used in previous emails on this thread) perhaps be more = descriptive? Thanks, Matteo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?822F9D2B-A82F-4765-8765-6604F9F79CBC>