Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:55:48 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB vendore designations.. Message-ID: <41D44F34.8070005@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20041230.104652.72711160.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200412292023.iBTKNIp93736@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <20041229.140208.104029434.imp@harmony.village.org> <200412300719.iBU7JlL06874@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <20041230.104652.72711160.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > >This isn't true. Julian committed a huge diff, it failed, he backed >it out. I've committed parts of the non conflicting stuff, and will >continue to do so cautiously. > Actually that's not quite true.. I made two commits.. one , very small that added items from Dragonfly that were not in freeBSD already. That one was ok. the large one that I reverted was stuff from NetBSD. Dragonfly actually committed it and fixed it. > >: As NetBSD is somewhat more state-of-the-art here, the majority of >: catching-up needs to happen in D/FBSD. And OpenBSD. > >Actually, that's not entirely true either. FreeBSD had a boatload of >vendors not in NetBSD, and there's general agreement that the OpenBSD >shortness of names is a good thing. > yes, in looking at the merge, there are more new IDs going from FreeBSD -> netBSD than visa versa.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41D44F34.8070005>