Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:36:36 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c support.s src/sys/i386/include md_var.h src/sys/i386/isa npx.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 support.s src/sys/powerpc/powerpc bcopy.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 support.S ... Message-ID: <20030404173635.GA22147@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200304041729.h34HTtVb027430@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200304041729.h34HTtVb027430@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:29:55AM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Define ovbcopy() as a macro which expands to the equivalent bcopy() call, > to take care of the KAME IPv6 code which needs ovbcopy() because NetBSD's > bcopy() doesn't handle overlap like ours. Was this for optimization reasons, hysterical raisins, or some other reason? Kris --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+jcKjWry0BWjoQKURAg4CAKClO+RSN564ucd303mJLtTaxyE45wCgpNF9 65d/SLnToDEO5a++NPvOQ70= =Eq2C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030404173635.GA22147>