Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:04:23 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux compatability broken? Message-ID: <20020724200423.GF13851@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20020724141236.M11673-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> References: <20020724184332.GE13851@dan.emsphone.com> <20020724141236.M11673-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 24), Eric Dedrick said: > > 11590 ktrace NAMI "/compat/svr4/lib/ld-linux.so.2" > > > > Why does it think the binary is an svr4 binary? That's why the > > syscalls still don't match and you get SIGSYS after a while. > > Something sounds really out of sync. > > That's kind of what I thought. I tried re-brandelf'ing my version of > netscape just to make sure it was doing linux and not svr4, and it > just complained about something else. I also don't think that > linux-netscape is elf format. I don't know that one can brand file > types other than elf. Besides, it worked fine before, the brand on > these linux files is what it should be I assume. If you don't load the svr4 module (and don't have options COMPAT_SVR4 in your config file), it shouldn't look in /compat/svr4. Try removing those and see what happens. Symlinking /compat/svr4 to /compat/linux won't do a thing, since the syscalls don't match. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020724200423.GF13851>