Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:59:26 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mbuf header bloat ? 
Message-ID:  <73832.1038247166@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:31:39 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021125111737.36232C-100000@fledge.watson.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021125111737.36232C-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robe
rt Watson writes:
>
>On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>> I propose that we make struct label portion of the pkthdr compile-time
>> conditional on MAC.  The assumption is that you will move the MAC label
>> to an m_tag sometime after 5.0-RELEASE. 

I object to this.  I spent time getting rid of variant sized structs
in -current, and we should not reintroduce them.

If you wonder why this is important, think:
	kld-load
and 
	forgetting the necessary opt_bla.h #includes.

Poul-Henning


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73832.1038247166>