Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:10:51 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: powerd freeze with amd 5000 X2 but not with lower cpus Message-ID: <200708230910.52163.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070823124236.26941A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070823124236.26941A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote:
>
> Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not
> economy, and so will always run these boxes on AC power, not battery):
>
> a) why you think that line in /etc/rc.d/power_profile is 'funny'?
>
well, in first place because it gave an error, I haven't looked deeper at that
moment because I was after something else
so now I did because of your question and it seems the power_profile script
has a bug
I tries to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1
but I guess it should be dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest
> b) what value for performance_cx_lowest you would consider more
> appropriate to use than C1, and why?
>
I didn't said that, My comment was not regarding the value but the error per
se
> c) whether you have overridden the /etc/defaults/rc.conf values for
> {performance,economy}_cx_lowest or {performance,economy}_cpu_freq ?
>
no
--
Joćo
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708230910.52163.joao>