Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:01:15 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        scottl@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
References:  <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
            Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?

Most likely historical inertia...  No body noticed until that module
build got more facist.

Warner


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131.000115.04191271.imp>