Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 22:03:33 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates panics Message-ID: <19980926220333.A20259@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199809261518.IAA00908@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>; from Don Lewis on Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 08:18:10AM -0700 References: <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> <199809261518.IAA00908@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Don Lewis: > I hadn't heard this. I don't know why that would be true. I remember people getting panics when running noatime with SU. I've got a few myself (although they were more unstable than now). > the inodes of files that had only been read. If you are only reading > files on the filesystem, I don't see where softupdates buys you any > performance increase, whereas noatime does. I just found that it doesn't seem to make a big difference having both. YMMV... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-BETA #0: Sat Sep 19 23:38:25 CEST 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980926220333.A20259>