Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:50:55 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Nikola Le??i?? <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net> Cc: FreeBSD-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nvidia-driver and shadows Message-ID: <20081229125055.GA50791@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081029201710.1854f44b@anthesphoria.net> References: <20081029201710.1854f44b@anthesphoria.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:17:10PM +0100, Nikola Le??i?? wrote: > Hello, Hi, and sorry for awfully belated reply. > > I'm curious what is the idea behind > > @exec mv -f %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/libwfb.so %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/XXX-libwfb.so.%%%%.%%XSERVVERSION%% && ln -sf libnvidia-wfb.so.1 %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/libwfb.so > > in ports/nvidia-driver/pkg-plist? If this is so, there is no way to get > shadows working in Emerald. If I revert the situation, i.e. set the link > like this manually: > > libwfb.so -> XXX-libwfb.so.%%.xorg-server-1.4.2,1 > > then I have shadows with no obvious ill effect. The same is true for > driver versions 173 and 177. Interesting. FWIW, nVidia creates the symlink libwfb.so -> libnvidia-wfb.so.1 itself (per their Makefiles), the line above is to mimic this behavior when installing from package. Have you tried asking on nVidia's official forums or maillists? I will certainly conduct more tests myself. Thanks. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081229125055.GA50791>