Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:20:21 -0600 From: Joe Halpin <joe.halpin@attbi.com> To: "standards@FreeBSD.ORG" <standards@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: at utility changes Message-ID: <3C307425.7ECED11D@attbi.com> References: <3C200BBA.9D26ED93@attbi.com> <20011228031537.B99161@espresso.q9media.com> <3C2DF35D.1F54BBC3@attbi.com> <20011229153328.D99161@espresso.q9media.com> <20011230102138.GJ69365@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20011230130404.A78954@colnta.acns.ab.ca> <3C307398.5A83DEE4@attbi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Halpin wrote: > > I've got a question for the standards gurus here. The POSIX draft says > the following: > > "XSI Users shall be permitted to use at if their name appears in the > file /usr/lib/cron/at.allow. If that file does not exist, the file > /usr/lib/cron/at.deny shall be checked to determine whether the user > shall be denied access to at..." > > Currently, at(1) looks for these files in /var/at. It's been suggested > that I symbolicly link them to /var/cron from there. Anyone have an Sorry, by "there", I meant /usr/lib/cron. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C307425.7ECED11D>