Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:12:11 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to avoid building of all llvm/clang-related stuff on recent CURRENT? Message-ID: <7e07a3a7-21ba-4770-8dd3-feff92b41f7a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <16ef72c6-38b1-5c58-bd0f-ab5d4eebf743@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <1eddd30d-2743-890f-3e9b-eff06a1d9a41@FreeBSD.org> <37FC8627-D520-4BAF-B168-783F39F44CAF@FreeBSD.org> <16ef72c6-38b1-5c58-bd0f-ab5d4eebf743@ShaneWare.Biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30.01.2018 7:05, Shane Ambler wrote: > You may also (soon) need WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD, there are plans to enable > LLD by default. I think, WITHOUT_LLD should be enough, together with WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP. > Looking at man src.conf on current, > > WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER enforces - > WITHOUT_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP > WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP > WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP > WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP > > I think WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP might belong in that list. Yess! > There is also a WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN which enforces - > WITHOUT_BINUTILS > WITHOUT_CLANG > WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS > WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL > WITHOUT_GCC > WITHOUT_GDB > WITHOUT_INCLUDES > WITHOUT_LLD > WITHOUT_LLDB > > which WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD might also belong to, there is no mention of > other options enforcing it. I don't remember now why I use WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN only at installworld stage… There was a reason, but I don't remember it! > Shouldn't nanobsd disable these by default? nanobsd doesn't disable anything by default, and, IMHO, it is right way to go. -- // Lev Serebryakov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7e07a3a7-21ba-4770-8dd3-feff92b41f7a>