Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:39:36 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass9573@gmx.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ppp in vimages? Message-ID: <4B192D38.6020309@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1803A0.6000403@elischer.org> References: <66313f8d0912020817x5839715ake916804d61dea730@mail.gmail.com> <20091202224841.O83957@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <66313f8d0912030616h691b149ay64dac79214336c45@mail.gmail.com> <4B1803A0.6000403@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > possibly. but try running 'ngctl list' in the jail to list all the nodes > it can see there. > > as well as ifconfig > > there might be an order dependency: > try this: > reboot with no netgraph nodes loaded. > make the jail > move vr0 to teh jail using ifconfig > kldload ng_ether > kldload ng_pppoe > (in the jail) run ngctl list > (in the jail) run ifconfig > > and see if the result is different > > if so then the trick would be to have the interfsce alreday in > the right jail when the ng_ether nodes are created. > > if you do it the other way around it is possible that moving > theinterfaces to a new jail doesn't move the netgraph nodes > associated, leaving them behind in the old jail. Sorry for the chipping in, What you describe Julian, works as expected. The problem is that this can work in a static setup, where one builds the physical topology and kldloads the ng_ether module. I am very interested in doing network simulations using vimage/vnet, thus want to be able to create and destroy topologies as wanted. Can I somehow overcome this? Thanks, Nikos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B192D38.6020309>