Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:52:28 +0800 From: Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/newpg Makefile Message-ID: <20030302095228.GA6488@utopia.leeym.com> In-Reply-To: <20030301213545.Q4032@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <200303020308.h2238lr3081867@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030301213545.Q4032@znfgre.tberna.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:36:48PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm confused about the PORTREVISION bump. What functionality has the port
> grown as a result of these changes that would cause a user who had
> installed it previously to want to reinstall it?
This patch add gnupg in RUN_DEPENDS, which makes the package of newpg-0.9.4_1
differ from newpg-0.9.4's (one line added: @pkgdep gnupg-xxx)
--
Yen-Ming Lee [§õ«Û©ú] KeyID: 0x5EB52E51 : www.leeym.com : Taipei, Taiwan
leeym@{ leeym.com, FreeBSD.org, yahoo-inc.com, ntu.edu.tw, civil.ncku.edu.tw }
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iQCVAwUBPmHUXMnMx0NetS5RAQEVkAP8DQYVqwEHQcLUuJjKSrSE0v5GBu6f0kM9
a+IV2wTqYocRjV+bdYqxxMvSIiyU05b+ppvwCkfzif9HBRCPR92bdOSmkM11C1c1
7N9g/xNYKPH8RnZ6W5r+BiuBbqcvgwPD3rfjPRtaUmrukDnOVYvv8Ne3XBHA90hG
1sam3pnCkyY=
=yUPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030302095228.GA6488>