Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:19:53 +0300
From:      Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>
To:        Duncan Campbell <campbell@tagish.taiga.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, mailman@crypton.pl
Subject:   Re: kern.ps_showallprocs and procfs
Message-ID:  <20020930151953.GA44971@nevermind.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <200209271254.GAA18796@tagish.taiga.ca>
References:  <200209271254.GAA18796@tagish.taiga.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Duncan Campbell!

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:54:08AM -0600, you wrote:

> I tend to regard procfs as something of a debugging tool.  If
> you limit it as is probably necessary to do what you suggest, 
> its value as a tool becomes degraded.
No, I don't think that procfs is debugging tool. It is used by
OpenOffice, for example.

-- 
NEVE-RIPE
Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group
http://uafug.org.ua/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020930151953.GA44971>