Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:59:59 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@rktmb.org> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html Message-ID: <4E5CB49F.50806@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/30/11 11:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison >> with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD >> over other systems. > > I dont think a monthly update is the good solution. > A per release update is better, as far as releases bring a new set > that could be compared. > > Then, a deep knwoledge of the other OSes is required in order to keep > credit. I think it's a huge amount of work, that should be assigned to > the project itself. > > IMHO, Let's delegate this task to Wikipedia or StackOverflow... > We havn't started updating the old one and now we start thingking about management and scheduling? I would be happy if such a page would see an update in shorter terms like 11 years ... Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5CB49F.50806>