Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:39:21 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1) Message-ID: <AANLkTi=rmHkPjoWF81iWRus%2BxD9jav=czCokZtK9JJH9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101021224237.GG52404@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20101020174854.GZ21226@albert.catwhisker.org> <20101021215330.GA86224@dan.emsphone.com> <20101021224237.GG52404@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 October 2010 06:42, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote: >> Julian's suggestion of booting the 8.1 kernel on the 7.1 OS will definitely >> narrow down the list of suspects. > > I'll see about doing something along those lines, but I doubt it will be > all that helpful, actually. It narrows down the suspect to the kernel, rather than the userland. The third option is that it's both kernel+userland and some way they play badly together; let's hope it isn't that. adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=rmHkPjoWF81iWRus%2BxD9jav=czCokZtK9JJH9>