Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Dec 2017 17:11:40 +0000
From:      "Gary J. Hayers" <gary@hayers.org>
To:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
Subject:   Re: Create list of ports to update
Message-ID:  <584c71d9-c97c-eb4b-66a2-b89e5cbc4daf@hayers.org>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR2001MB17308EADD4DFC564D402D994803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
References:  <BN6PR2001MB17305559DF55EB2CF39C2959803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <8d5d17b8-a206-810a-b92e-a29d053dd8e3@hayers.org> <BN6PR2001MB17308EADD4DFC564D402D994803F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/12/2017 17:03, Carmel NY wrote:
> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 11:44 AM, Gary J. Hayers stated:
>>
>>
>> On 03/12/2017 16:40, Carmel NY wrote:
>>> Reading up on "poudriere", it appears that I have to feed it a list of
>>> ports that need to be updated. Unlike "synth" which can figure that
>>> out by itself, it does seem counterproductive.
>>>
>>> My question, now that "portmaster" is apparently dead in the water,
>>> what is the easiest way to construct a list of ports that need updating in
>> the:
>>> "port-category/port-name" format?
> 
>> pkg query '%o' > ports.txt
> 
> Doesn't that just list all of the installed ports, not just the ones that need updating?
> 

It does, my apologies, I read the question wrong

-- 

Regards,
Gary J. Hayers
gary@hayers.org

PGP Signature
https://www.hayers.org/pgp



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?584c71d9-c97c-eb4b-66a2-b89e5cbc4daf>