Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:24:17 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ten thousand small processes
Message-ID:  <20030623022417.GC52619@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200306222000.59352.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References:  <20030621185821.30070.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20030621200207.GA76101@dragon.nuxi.com> <200306222000.59352.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:00:59PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Saturday 21 June 2003 22:02, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > That is a question for gcc@gcc.gnu.org.  We use a 99% stock GCC 3.2.2.
> 
> On 4.8? :)

We use a 97% stock GCC 2.95.3.  So it is still a question for
gcc@gcc.gnu.org.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030623022417.GC52619>