Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:24:17 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ten thousand small processes Message-ID: <20030623022417.GC52619@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200306222000.59352.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20030621185821.30070.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20030621200207.GA76101@dragon.nuxi.com> <200306222000.59352.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:00:59PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Saturday 21 June 2003 22:02, David O'Brien wrote: > > > That is a question for gcc@gcc.gnu.org. We use a 99% stock GCC 3.2.2. > > On 4.8? :) We use a 97% stock GCC 2.95.3. So it is still a question for gcc@gcc.gnu.org. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030623022417.GC52619>