Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:53:01 -0500 From: "Will Saxon" <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> To: "Jacob S. Barrett" <jbarrett@amduat.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867DD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob S. Barrett [mailto:jbarrett@amduat.net] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 5:17 PM > To: Will Saxon > Cc: eberkut@minithins.net; freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding >=20 >=20 > On Monday 08 March 2004 01:41 pm, Will Saxon wrote: > > Regardless, it doesn't look like ng_fec can work with ng_vlan, since > > it doesn't provide any hooks to work with. >=20 > Couldn't you attach ng_vlan downstream to the ng_ether lower=20 > that will created=20 > for the ng_fec interface? Maybe, but when you load ng_ether it tries to name the node fec0 then = fails since there is already a node named fec0. I don't know how to name = or reference a node that is unnamed and not hooked to anything, so I was = not able to make this work. -Will
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867DD>