Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:06:21 +0800 From: ykla <yklaxds@gmail.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience Message-ID: <CA%2BPGaYDAZFFWCJoUKgH36WOHeSGnvXXvWMg%2BCrBH=LS8-zgD6w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <Y9ec/fbWPodGjyoP@home.opsec.eu> References: <202301300254.30U2sm0k061914@dell.no.berklix.net> <97020cad-f913-2985-2093-e4c23bf671e3@antonovs.family> <86357sxsly.fsf@cthulhu.stephaner.labo.int> <CA%2BPGaYD4nRtodOxZWdd11f1eXrP_EXxYRGLY4f3PpvNw-ViyrA@mail.gmail.com> <Y9ec/fbWPodGjyoP@home.opsec.eu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, The documentation project on reviews.freebsd.org is also very inactive. For example, it's been almost 3 months since I submitted my revision - https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37322. After I submitted it, it was neither reviewed nor approved for a long time. Now, due to changes in the FreeBSD documentation, some of my changes conflict with the current documentation and are difficult to resolve. I suppose I could spend some time going over it again and again, but if no one accepts it, it is pointless. Maybe I shouldn't make such extensive changes to the documentation.Can you advise me on how I should go about doing this? Thanks a lot. ykla Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> 于2023年1月30日周一 18:33写道： > Hello, > > > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed > to > > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for > > the automated bug reports from the bots. > > I have not had any replies to my several posts either. > > > So can the admins tell how many people actually > > subscribe to FreeBSD-doc, > > The list has 496 subscribers right now. (speaking as one of postmaster@). > > > or is this just a place to report bugs and people > > should discuss FreeBSD doc-related issues elsewhere? Or is it that almost > > nobody cares about the FreeBSD documentation? > > From my observation, the last few month led to a huge pile of > workload on many folks that are involved with FreeBSD stuff, so > not many folks had time to reply/think things through/answer. > I had the same problem... > > I see doc-stuff happen mostly on reviews.freebsd.org. (speaking > as one of phabric-admins). Pau Amma is the most active docs-person > as far as I can see. I have not calculated stats, just my gut feeling. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div>Hi, </div><div><br></div><div>The documentation project on <a href="http://reviews.freebsd.org">reviews.freebsd.org</a>; is also very inactive. For example, it's been almost 3 months since I submitted my revision - <a href="https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37322">https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37322</a>. After I submitted it, it was neither reviewed nor approved for a long time. Now, due to changes in the FreeBSD documentation, some of my changes conflict with the current documentation and are difficult to resolve. I suppose I could spend some time going over it again and again, but if no one accepts it, it is pointless. Maybe I shouldn't make such extensive changes to the documentation.Can you advise me on how I should go about doing this? Thanks a lot.<br></div><div><br></div><div>ykla</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Kurt Jaeger <<a href="mailto:pi@freebsd.org">pi@freebsd.org</a>> 于2023年1月30日周一 18:33写道：<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br> <br> > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed to<br> > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for<br> > the automated bug reports from the bots.<br> > I have not had any replies to my several posts either.<br> <br> > So can the admins tell how many people actually<br> > subscribe to FreeBSD-doc,<br> <br> The list has 496 subscribers right now. (speaking as one of postmaster@).<br> <br> > or is this just a place to report bugs and people<br> > should discuss FreeBSD doc-related issues elsewhere? Or is it that almost<br> > nobody cares about the FreeBSD documentation?<br> <br> >From my observation, the last few month led to a huge pile of<br> workload on many folks that are involved with FreeBSD stuff, so<br> not many folks had time to reply/think things through/answer.<br> I had the same problem...<br> <br> I see doc-stuff happen mostly on <a href="http://reviews.freebsd.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">reviews.freebsd.org</a>. (speaking<br> as one of phabric-admins). Pau Amma is the most active docs-person<br> as far as I can see. I have not calculated stats, just my gut feeling.<br> <br> -- <br> <a href="mailto:pi@opsec.eu" target="_blank">pi@opsec.eu</a> +49 171 3101372 Now what ?<br> <br> </blockquote></div></div>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BPGaYDAZFFWCJoUKgH36WOHeSGnvXXvWMg%2BCrBH=LS8-zgD6w>