Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:07:24 +0400 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org> To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What we keep under /etc Message-ID: <20041011080724.GK694@elendil.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041010081947.GA61957@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> References: <200410071355.i97DtSJq024575@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041009011553.01708de1@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20041009083519.GA84548@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0410090841580.2113@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <xzpr7o8ng1p.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20041009183217.GJ84228@lucky.net> <41683D43.4020403@gamersimpact.com> <20041010081947.GA61957@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-10-10 at 10:19 +0200, John Hay wrote: > While /usr/local/etc/rc.d works ok for a lot of things, it doesn't work > well for everything that one might want to add because it is only run > very late in the boot order. To be able to have something run somewhere > in the beginning, say before the NETWORKING phase, you have to add it > to /etc/rc.d, except if we add something like /etc/local.rc.d and also > add it to /etc/rc so that rcorder use both simultaneously, something > like 'rcorder ... /etc/rc.d/* /etc/local.rc.d/*'. I was wondering about this one, too. Is there any problem with this approach? Sergei
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041011080724.GK694>