Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:51:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Jin Guojun <jguojun@sbcglobal.net> To: Questions Freebsd <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: X Window is sluggish in 10.2-R (nv server for GeForce 210) Message-ID: <1972431430.5431515.1439704317249.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1614462542.1974994.1439701288919.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1614462542.1974994.1439701288919.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It looks like not just X server is slow, other servers slow too and take a =
lot of CPU.Those services take less than 10% total CPU when running 8.4 / 1=
0.1.
Is something under 10.2-R needs to be tuned for performance?
-Jin
last pid:=C2=A0 1088;=C2=A0 load averages:=C2=A0 1.93,=C2=A0 1.07,=C2=A0 0.=
53=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 up 0+00:05:16=C2=A0 22:49:12
58 processes:=C2=A0 3 running, 55 sleeping
CPU: 19.9% user,=C2=A0 0.0% nice, 61.0% system,=C2=A0 0.3% interrupt, 18.8%=
idle
Mem: 402M Active, 513M Inact, 528M Wired, 192K Cache, 821M Buf, 6440M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
=C2=A0 PID USERNAME=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 THR PRI NICE=C2=A0=C2=A0 SIZE=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 RES STATE=C2=A0=C2=A0 C=C2=A0=C2=A0 TIME=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 WCP=
U COMMAND
=C2=A0 951 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 75=C2=
=A0 20=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 711M=C2=A0=C2=A0 365M uwait=C2=A0=C2=
=A0 3=C2=A0=C2=A0 1:17 115.23% firefox
=C2=A01083 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
1=C2=A0 89=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 36688K=C2=A0 5988K CPU0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:47=C2=A0 55.37% imapd
=C2=A01081 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
1=C2=A0 88=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 36688K=C2=A0 5988K CPU2=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 2=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:47=C2=A0 52.59% imapd
=C2=A01077 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 44=C2=
=A0 21=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 555M=C2=A0=C2=A0 271M uwait=C2=A0=C2=
=A0 1=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:19=C2=A0 21.14% thunderbi
=C2=A0 923 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
5=C2=A0 20=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 460M=C2=A0=C2=A0 363M uwait=C2=
=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:09=C2=A0=C2=A0 2.20% Xorg
=C2=A0 777 root=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 1=C2=
=A0 20=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 16728K=C2=A0 2236K select=C2=A0 2=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:=
00=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.00% moused
last pid:=C2=A0 1090;=C2=A0 load averages:=C2=A0 3.67,=C2=A0 2.11,=C2=A0 1.=
04=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 up 0+00:07:51=C2=A0 22:51:47
58 processes:=C2=A0 3 running, 55 sleeping
CPU: 19.9% user,=C2=A0 0.0% nice, 63.8% system,=C2=A0 0.6% interrupt, 15.7%=
idle
Mem: 604M Active, 592M Inact, 576M Wired, 192K Cache, 820M Buf, 6110M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
=C2=A0 PID USERNAME=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 THR PRI NICE=C2=A0=C2=A0 SIZE=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 RES STATE=C2=A0=C2=A0 C=C2=A0=C2=A0 TIME=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 WCP=
U COMMAND
=C2=A0 951 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 73=C2=
=A0 20=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 708M=C2=A0=C2=A0 364M uwait=C2=A0=C2=
=A0 2=C2=A0=C2=A0 4:22 112.79% firefox
=C2=A01083 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
1 101=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 36688K=C2=A0 5988K CPU2=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 2=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 2:46=C2=A0 94.78% imapd
=C2=A01081 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
1 101=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 36688K=C2=A0 5988K CPU0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 2:46=C2=A0 94.48% imapd
=C2=A01077 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 41=C2=
=A0 24=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 767M=C2=A0=C2=A0 481M uwait=C2=A0=C2=
=A0 3=C2=A0=C2=A0 1:02=C2=A0 34.62% thunderbi
=C2=A0 923 jin=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
5=C2=A0 20=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0=C2=A0=C2=A0 452M=C2=A0=C2=A0 355M uwait=C2=
=A0=C2=A0 1=C2=A0=C2=A0 0:12=C2=A0=C2=A0 2.10% Xorg
=20
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 10:01 PM, Jin Guojun <jguojun@sbcglobal.n=
et> wrote:
=20
A machine with AMD A8-6600K with Radeon + Nvidia GeForce 210 graphic card.=
It works with FreeBSD 8.4-R .. 10.1-R well; however, after upgraded to 10.2=
-R,=20
X Window seems having problem in doing configuration and running server.
In X -configure, the xorg.conf.new generated correctly, but have error at t=
he end says "number of screen s does not match number of devices. It found =
two screens and two devices (see log below), so not sure what is the proble=
m.
When startx, moving window around and scrolling window (using sliding bar) =
are very sluggish.When exist X window, server generate a non-error error:
[=C2=A0 2700.740] (EE) Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file=
.
Does this mean that a Xorg 7.7_2 has some defect?
Does anyone encounter the similar issue in 10.2-Release?
-Jin
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 16 13:14:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77CB9B9CBA
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de
[IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDF01D21
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:21 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1439730852; l=1213;
s=domk; d=ib-haakh.de;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:
Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date;
bh=OWRzIsb8a3tHUcBHVN266JheUJM4seK2jMVaUX+RdvY=;
b=oBgpZASknE5aB4TzFKFKaKFyj8KwlrDVspgHdDFejlhbS++UjAK56T5iszI/Iibnvri
XMAEOHdV5gsGEF/39lNxeDrIl5ZUcQ15C7nCebRw0/i26kuCaT2WrfmbZRDVQUwq0p0EX
DTnzWFugvoPVHsxPCcmPOvDPuRezmt7a3EY=
X-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjNur9OZW5
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A70E62.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.14.98])
by post.strato.de (RZmta 37.9 DYNA|AUTH)
with ESMTPA id Z00a76r7GDEBJCh;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16])
by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t7GDEBQc093552;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
Message-ID: <55D08CA3.7050306@ib-haakh.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200
From: "Dr. Andreas Haakh" <bugReporter@ib-haakh.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Smith <paul.j.smith0@gmail.com>
CC: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: a bug in /bin/ls
References: <55CD23C7.9010803@ib-haakh.de>
<CACoaAtPak43P9N+hcjXWAm2rdFAA5Z8NXAnaxxTcvy5Lxod4fQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACoaAtPak43P9N+hcjXWAm2rdFAA5Z8NXAnaxxTcvy5Lxod4fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:23 -0000
Am 14.08.2015 um 05:26 schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dr. Andreas Haakh
> <bugReporter@ib-haakh.de> wrote:
>> On:
>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #0
>> r286580: Mon Aug 10 19:49:05 CEST 2015
>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64
>>
>> using the "-U"-flag in /bin/ls together with "-l"
>> leads to the following output
>> [...]
>> -rwxr--r-- 1 krabbe ibh 798720 1 Jan 1970 IMAG1562.jpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 krabbe ibh 579493 1 Jan 1970 IMAG1714.jpg
>> [...]
>>
>> and the sorting is not affected by the flag (still by name).
>>
>>
>
> >From the man page:
>
> -U Use time when file was created for sorting or printing.
>
> -u Use time of last access, instead of time of last modification
> of the file for sorting (-t) or printing (-l).
>
> -t Sort by descending time modified (most recently modified first). . . .
>
> Does something like ls -Ult give you what you want? My interpretation
> is that -u and -U need to be combined with -t or -l.
>
> I think the -c option works the same way.
> Did you get different output on a previous FreeBSD version?
>
> Paul
-Ult returns Jan 1st 1970 as well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1972431430.5431515.1439704317249.JavaMail.yahoo>