Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 19:56:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 291316] textproc/libxml2: Update to 2.15.1 Message-ID: <bug-291316-39348-6dDjxL9iP9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-291316-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291316 Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|core@FreeBSD.org | --- Comment #18 from Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #10) You don't get to crash-out and complain when you don't get your way when actual objections have been raised. Since you insist, the plan is to come up with something that doesn't need to involve docs, ie can be dropped as it's not critical functionality. Patch to post immediately after this comment. exp-run it to check for consumer API/ABI breaks, and start getting those fixes (and maintainer approvals) moving. Concurrently, figure out how to deal with docs. If docs are not figured out after exp-run finishes and consumers fixed, commit without docs. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/merge_requests/345 (by one of the current upstream maintainers) is not getting included here until it is committed upstream. A CI test upstream suggests this breaks API. (In reply to Matthias Andree from comment #17) Still need to think on this more. Unfortunately the doxygen overhaul they did also usurped man page generation, and that's more important to include in the "main" package than the HTML developer documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-291316-39348-6dDjxL9iP9>