Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 01:33:41 -0800 (PST) From: graphix@iastate.edu To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: bin/2168: A few common protocols missing from /etc/protocols Message-ID: <199612070933.BAA18139@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <199612070940.BAA18388@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 2168 >Category: bin >Synopsis: A few common protocols missing from /etc/protocols >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 7 01:40:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kent Vander Velden >Organization: ISU >Release: 3.0-CURRENT >Environment: FreeBSD pseudo.cc.iastate.edu 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Nov 27 13:34:20 CST 1996 root@pseudo.cc.iastate.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/PSEUDO i386 >Description: While there are several protocols mentioned in rfc-1700 that are missing from /etc/protocols there are some that are rather common that are missing such as 9-IGP. Is the main reason for not including all the protocols that are specificed in rfc-1700 (or perhaps a later version when this is read) mainly to speed the running time of the getproto*() family of functions? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Add the specified numbers by rfc's to the protocols file. >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612070933.BAA18139>