Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 16:45:17 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs.c pseudofs.h pseudofs_fileno.c pseudofs_internal.h pseudofs_vncache.c pseudofs_vnops.c Message-ID: <1478.986741117@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Apr 2001 15:39:54 %2B0200." <xzpbsq7bjdh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpbsq7bjdh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: >> In message <xzpsnjjbtc7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >> > It supplies a common framework for procfs, linprocfs and other similar >> > fs'es (e.g. kernfs, if we hadn't nuked it). >> So basically the "UFS" off pseudo-FS's ? > >I don't know the fs system well enough to fully understand your >question. UFS is the generic naming layer for FFS. FFS only does the layout stuff, it doesn't worry about filenames at all, only inodes. I pressume your pseudofs in a similar way hides all the directory handling for virtual filesystems ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1478.986741117>