Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:10:49 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@kukulies.org> Cc: Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev <timon@memphis.mephi.ru> Subject: Re: gimp fails suddenly Message-ID: <20031212161049.7e081c37.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20031212143609.GA20325@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> <1071238350.735.3.camel@timon.nist> <20031212143609.GA20325@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:36:09 +0100
"Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@kukulies.org> wrote:
> > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1
> >
> > I've put it into sysctl.conf, and run with it.
>
> That's fine. Just tell me, what does this actually mean? Is it practically
> the same as running gimp --no-shm ? Or is shm activated (like a module being
> not present and the getting loaded?).
AFAIK:
This allows to use already removed shm... if you know C, something like:
free(my_string_buffer);
printf("%d\n" my_string_buffer);
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031212161049.7e081c37.Alexander>