Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 21:20:46 +0930 (CST) From: james <wabit@adl.ussr.net> To: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> Cc: Brennan W Stehling <brennan@offwhite.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0 already? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005132119520.13511-100000@gw.Adl.USSR.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10005130735370.20100-100000@hydrant.intranova.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess we'll know if bsd gets taken over by micro$oft, because we'll have freebsd 2000! :-)) regards james On Sat, 13 May 2000, Omachonu Ogali wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 07:40:33 -0400 (EDT) > From: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> > To: Brennan W Stehling <brennan@offwhite.net> > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: 5.0 already? > > On Sat, 13 May 2000, Brennan W Stehling wrote: [snip] > No, FreeBSD isn't doing a Slackware-type scheme. > > > Are we going to be running version 9.0 in less than 5 years? > > Possibly. I mean, do the differences between version numbers make a > difference to the operating system itself? If 4.0 was called 10.0, would > it matter that it has a new number? What if it was called 1.15? Version > numbers are just there for the purposes of keeping track of things, the > numbers themselves don't influence the software, and it's up to the > manafacturer of whatever software product to increment the version numbers > in any way they feel fit. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005132119520.13511-100000>