Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 May 2006 16:22:55 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage1 Makefile
Message-ID:  <20060521202255.GA78571@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060521201902.GI93253@droso.net>
References:  <200605211823.k4LINxb7026956@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060521200121.GA14051@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060521201902.GI93253@droso.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:19:03PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 04:01:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:23:59PM +0000, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > > erwin       2006-05-21 18:23:59 UTC
> > >=20
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > >=20
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage1 Makefile=20
> > >   Log:
> > >   Try a different way to find(1) to prevent chmod(1) from traversing
> > >   into linprocfs as fstype doesn't seem to work on pointyhat.
> > >   Not bumping PORTREVISION as it only affects pointyhat.
> >=20
> > I suspect this may be an ABI incompatibility between 4.x userland and
> > 6.x/7.x kernel, i.e. the interface between libc and kernel was changed
> > and no compatibility mode was added for supporting old binaries.
> > There is another port (am-utils) that fails to build from a similar
> > problem.
> >=20
> Wouldn't it also fail on a marcuscom tinderbox with a 4.x environment on
> a 6.1 system if that was the case? That's what I used for testing and it
> didn't fail, so I'm just trying to pinpoint what would make pointyhat
> behave differently.

It should, unless it's a 7.0 regression.  I certainly don't do
anything special with find(1) or support libraries in the chroot, and
I presume the marcuscom tinderbox doesn't either.

You could test by extracting your own 4.11 chroot and running find by
hand.

Kris

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEcMwfWry0BWjoQKURAjHpAKCrMLITztGKIkXIGlauF7Jabc2KHwCgrVBY
6L8OWMIpIj3RaBs2xQ1oUqg=
=0Pvu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060521202255.GA78571>