Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:09:16 -1000 From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us> In-Reply-To: <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/11/2012 05:03 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:10:13PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> However, I think the majority of users can get by just fine using clang, >> right now. Doug Barton even confirmed in this thread that 80% of our >> ports already work with it! > > He stated that 80% build with clang. I doubt that he actually > tested the functionality of some 17000 ports. Correct. Also, users who actually are helping with testing clang for ports continue to report runtime problems, even with things that build fine. Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5050513C.7040100>