Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 16:05:39 +1000 From: David Nugent <davidn@unique.usn.blaze.net.au> To: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: longer usernames Message-ID: <199704240605.QAA26547@unique.usn.blaze.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:17:13 -0400." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970423235310.11216A-100000@ns2.harborcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Would it be possible for someone to commit the changes where a length of 8 > was assumed to 2.2? It shouldn't make any visible difference as long as > people keep the headers the same, right? Uh, sure, I guess. In fact, most of the -current code could be merged directly into 2.2 and it would make no difference at all. It was intentionally coded that way, so I guess it would be a good idea to do this. (Since I took care of some of this in -current I'll put it on my todo list :-)). Regards, David Nugent - Unique Computing Pty Ltd - Melbourne, Australia Voice +61-3-9791-9547 Data/BBS +61-3-9792-3507 3:632/348@fidonet davidn@freebsd.org davidn@blaze.net.au http://www.blaze.net.au/~davidn/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704240605.QAA26547>