Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:51:22 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <4BAE297A.6090702@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <c3e287ff1003252158h7b4aa911jaaf816d91ec2bfbf@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> <20100325142149.I44999@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <c3e287ff1003252158h7b4aa911jaaf816d91ec2bfbf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/26/10 04:58, Alexander Bubnov wrote: > Hello Harti and freebsd-net maillist! > One more question please in scope of snmp topic. does bsnmp support master > agentx mode? > I totally agree that would be a good way to go, but it's a case of someone having time to sit down and finish things off properly. (Unfortunately stuff on my plate mostly doesn't involve FreeBSD these days...) But agentx does have pluggability that other access modes don't, and it is probably the right fix for other stuff I look at.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BAE297A.6090702>