Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:05:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 268348] math/py-numpy: introduce FORTRAN / NOBLAS options Message-ID: <bug-268348-21822-zPqQru790a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-268348-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-268348-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-python (Nobody) <python@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-feedback: Bug 268348: math/py-numpy: introduce FORTRAN / NOBLAS options https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268348 --- Comment #19 from Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> --- Hello python@, I've reworked the original patch and I wonder if you could take another loo= k. I agree with Charlie that we need to be careful when adding extra options to Python ports. A potential pilot error could lead to a lot of frustration and long debugging. To address that I added an explicit warning to the option description. There is a precedence for such warnings in the ports tree and = it is a good middle ground for different ports usergroups. Regarding NumPy's support for NOBLAS: it is fully supported via internal fallback routines. Their implementation is not very performant, however, so= the option description warns about that. The new patch is here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52469 Best, Mateusz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268348-21822-zPqQru790a>