Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:33:37 -0800
From:      NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com
Cc:        current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: clang/3.7.1/include/ does not exist?
Message-ID:  <9D4F82FA-B447-4FA6-880F-D4049FFC75C1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1aDv4l-0005Cq-LG@rmm6prod02.runbox.com>
References:  <E1aDv4l-0005Cq-LG@rmm6prod02.runbox.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Dec 29, 2015, at 06:16, Jeffrey Bouquet <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:39:59 -0800 (PST), Roger Marquis =
<marquis@roble.com> wrote:

=E2=80=A6

> =
..........................................................................=
............................................................
> Not to divert the question and answer, but I recently posted and would =
like to restate that
> it would be useful for a wrapper for installworld after buildworld so =
that each command in
> installworld can complete successfully since the buildworld did.... if =
that would
> be easy to do,  BEFORE the actual installworld begins...   [not to =
mention its inclusion at
> the bottom of UPDATING in one or more of the methodologies ... =
eventually... ]
>=20
>  I've been tripped up many times lately, sometimes in a =
all-day-rollback fashion, by
> the installworld not completing where the buildworld did.
>=20
>  Seems it would be useful for production machines also...=20

This is one of the areas where snapshotting with filesystems would =
definitely come in handy, e.g. ZFS (snapshot before installworld, =
rollback if installworld fails).
Cheers,
-NGie=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9D4F82FA-B447-4FA6-880F-D4049FFC75C1>