Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:34:40 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: namei performance (was Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions)) Message-ID: <199609101734.KAA03032@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960910092153.1234A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> from "Michael Hancock" at Sep 10, 96 09:30:49 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I like the pre-parsing of the pathname into components idea for all these > reasons. Freeing the code from delimiter processing is definitely a win. I can't take credit; there's a lot of prior art for doing things this way. Microsfot does things this way in Win95 and NT, and they were not the first to do it (path cannonization). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609101734.KAA03032>