Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:35:15 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: =?utf-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Autofs. Message-ID: <5C88BFBD-798C-4F99-92E2-5F75FE622613@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20140804161710.GA32801@pc5.home> References: <20140730071933.GA20122@pc5.home> <3DA39B51-4CE5-437B-9B03-7E34CC954A7E@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20140804161710.GA32801@pc5.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04 Aug 2014, at 16:17 , Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a = <trasz@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 0804T1252, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On 30 Jul 2014, at 07:19 , Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a = <trasz@freebsd.org> wrote: >>=20 >>> At the link below you will find a patch that adds the new = automounter. >>> The patch is against yesterdays 11.0-CURRENT. >>>=20 >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~trasz/autofs-head-20140729.diff >>=20 >> I also just submitted = https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192379 to allow -o = vers=3D mount_nfs compatibility, which makes it easier to integrate with = Linux/OSX/Solaris LDAP setups and mount options from LDAP. >=20 > Nice! Will you commit it? Yeah and MFC for 10.1 unless someone speaks up the next day or two. I = have updated the man page locally and I emailed Rick Macklem; will see = if he=E2=80=99s around. >>> Testing is welcome. Please start with manual pages, eg. = automount(8). >>=20 >>=20 >> I found one case now doing the aforementioned where when the initial = mount_nfs fails (e.g., for invalid options), then a later mount did not = succeed either, with the correct mount options; I did try to run = automount -u in between tries, as well as service automountd restart, = but that did not make a change; given I was short on time, a reboot of = my desktop made this go away. Is there some =E2=80=9Cnegative = caching=E2=80=9D in the kernel module possibly that will not retry the = mount for another time or something=E2=80=94as in if I were more patient = and waited 5 minutes, would it maybe just have worked again? >=20 > There is no negative caching. I'll see if I can figure out the cause > for this. Thanks. I can possibly try to do some more tracing and debugging later = in the week if needed. =E2=80=94=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5C88BFBD-798C-4F99-92E2-5F75FE622613>