Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:34:34 -0400 From: "L Campbell" <llc2w@virginia.edu> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: moving sysutils/fusefs-kmod to base system Message-ID: <792298050809020534i65a9d6efv3f1b166dfe96ad7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200809021912.38401.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <48BB4FEB.1050906@gmail.com> <g9it70$bm7$1@ger.gmane.org> <200809021912.38401.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >> This can be done by documenting usage of make.conf PORTS_MODULES >> knob. > It would be nice if ports could put their kernel module source somewhere > so that a buildkernel would build it. If I'm reading make.conf(5) correctly, PORTS_MODULES does exactly that -- rebuilds the port whenever the kernel is built.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?792298050809020534i65a9d6efv3f1b166dfe96ad7>