Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:16:56 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current is sluggish Message-ID: <20060220201656.GA20356@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060220165019.GF55136@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <43ED294A.2050505@savvis.net> <43F6C577.5020901@savvis.net> <20060220165019.GF55136@comp.chem.msu.su>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:50:19PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 10:57:59PM -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > >Dear Hackers, > > > > > >after upgrading to today's current my laptop is very sluggish > [snip] > > and just to close this thread, all i had to do is put > > > > performance_cx_lowest="HIGH" > > > > into my /etc/rc.conf and then > > > > # /etc/rc.d/power_profile 0x01 > > > > this fixes things for me. > > > > i find it strange that /etc/defaults/rc.cond has > > performance_cx_lowest="LOW", but someone must have had a good reason for > > this. > > I'm about to run CURRENT on a rather modern laptop with all the > fancy power-control stuff, which I've never done before, so this > thread is rather interesting to me. According to rc.conf(5), > performance_cx_lowest specifies a CPU power state when idle. > Shouldn't it have no effect on the CPU speed when it has some real > work to do? Looks like there is significant latency in the CPU's > transition from idle state to active state -- at least in your case. Talk to njl@, who recently made this change. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD+iO3Wry0BWjoQKURAsIpAJsEc0+x35WkoDiFqAQuUYuNtq6GnACdGds2 KlTuJFm2kLV7/qjQmNlWvP8= =3CrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060220201656.GA20356>