Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 18:53:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r347410 - in head: . sys/amd64/conf sys/arm/conf sys/arm64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/riscv/conf sys/sparc64/conf Message-ID: <20190510185349.GA86585@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <c08bc620-8fca-230b-08a1-f6968d2b4fa8@yandex.ru> References: <201905092238.x49McFCO015665@repo.freebsd.org> <20190510084620.GA47901@FreeBSD.org> <1a15a141-89b7-9169-e4cc-df585e92ada1@yandex.ru> <20190510183939.GA75776@FreeBSD.org> <c08bc620-8fca-230b-08a1-f6968d2b4fa8@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:44:58PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 10.05.2019 21:39, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> The second cause -- reduce overhead that IPSEC produces even when it
> >> is not used.
> >
> > So does it mean that if I don't plan to use IPSEC, I can safely remove
> > IPSEC_SUPPORT from my config and also get slight performance boost?
>
> Yes, currently each call to IPsec has check like
> `if (ipsec_enabled) {...}`, when you build the kernel without
> IPSEC/IPSEC_SUPPORT, this check will be removed too, this can add some
> performance boost :-)
Got it. :-) Thanks for the fast response (and proper quoting).
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190510185349.GA86585>