Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 07:21:44 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP... Message-ID: <199605210521.HAA08699@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.92.960520200020.391D-100000@hamby1> from Jake Hamby at "May 20, 96 08:05:46 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jake Hamby wrote: > Okay, but there are already copies of some of these in /stand! Also, if It's always been our policy that /stand is not needed for system recovery (though perhaps useful). Managing the large blurb binary in /stand (or are it two of them? maybe) in case of partial upgrades (-current etc.) is much more difficult than the separate binaries under /bin. > nothing else, I would like a shared version of /bin/sh and /bin/csh for > faster interactive use, with a static /sbin/sh for boot-up scripts only. > Comments? Shared binaries are slower, not faster. ;) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605210521.HAA08699>