Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:52:13 +0200 From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports Message-ID: <CA%2BdUSyqZVVyVkVWTPJXJe921NcZ3RaEN9QojH55NhRNP8xDinA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyrV_j8GtxS4=yN-DsFCprQ7N%2BEmuRoraDwBLZN1EFFR9w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BdUSyrV_j8GtxS4=yN-DsFCprQ7N%2BEmuRoraDwBLZN1EFFR9w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! > > There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 > and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port > rebuild. > > The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D2= 8831 > > Frankly, I am also confused because I remember a relevant discussion a > few months ago in the lists. Traditionally a major RELEASE upgrade > requires a full ports rebuild, however this time there is no > COMPAT_FREEBSD8 in GENERIC and most upgraded systems seem to be > working fine. On the other hand this is stated in UPDATING: > > 20110828: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Bump the shared library version numbers for libraries that > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0do not use symbol versioning, have changed the ABI compare= d > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to stable/8 and which shared library version was not bumpe= d. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Done as part of 9.0-RELEASE cycle. > > Your input would be appreciated! > > Regards, > > -- > George Kontostanos > Aicom telecoms ltd Hmm, anyone :) ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdUSyqZVVyVkVWTPJXJe921NcZ3RaEN9QojH55NhRNP8xDinA>