Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:35:16 +0100 From: Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n Message-ID: <20090623213516.GQ64856@carrick.bishnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <3f6a88120906230713kf44c826x928beea65adf6c0e@mail.gmail.com> <20090623175247.GA65395@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:36:08PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category > >becomes a catch all for both entities. > > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is > too long, why not go with "nls"? How about internationalisation? ;-) Tim. -- Tim Bishop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090623213516.GQ64856>