Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:25:47 -0700 From: kstewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portindex/portindexdb Message-ID: <200409031925.47777.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> References: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 02 September 2004 06:17 am, Lucas Holt wrote: > After seeing several posts recently on portindex, I decided to try it > out. Most of the posts claimed you had to run portsdb -u after > portindex. > > Is it safe to use portindexdb instead of portsdb -u? > > Another words I want to do this: > cvsup ... > portindex > portindexdb > portversion -v | grep "<" > > Lucas Holt FWIW, portindexdb will generate INDEX-5.db just fine on 5-current. It doesn't have the problem with ruby bus erroring like portsdb -u does. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html Support the Bison at http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409031925.47777.kstewart>