Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:44:39 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: batching port builds Message-ID: <20060630193508.EDC6.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <200606301131.29593.daeg@houston.rr.com> <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for > > the port in whose directory you're currently in and all its dependencies. > > > > See 'man ports' for more information. > > > > To use those with 'portupgrade -a' will probably take some custom scripting. > > Ah, so there's no make.conf option for this? I have: BATCH= yes in my /etc/make.conf file and it works fine. Of course I either build the port directly or use portmanager to do it so it may not work with portupgrade, although I fail to see why it would not. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net I think it's wrong that only one company makes Monopoly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060630193508.EDC6.GERARD>