Date: 08 Feb 1999 18:15:57 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: "Jasper O'Malley" <jooji@webnology.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>, Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GPL *again* (was: New CODA release) Message-ID: <xzpww1szuia.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Jasper O'Malley"'s message of "Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:21:31 -0600 (CST)" References: <Pine.LNX.4.02.9902080914570.11830-100000@mercury.webnology.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jasper O'Malley" <jooji@webnology.com> writes: > On 8 Feb 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > If that was really their only motivation, they'd use something > > non-contagious. The contagion element of the GPL buys the developer > > nothing; > Sure it does. It says, "if you've got a piece of software that's got 90% > or my code in it and 10% of yours, you can't sell it unless you make the > source code available." Why should I need to make my 10% available? Is it not enough that I make your 90% available? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpww1szuia.fsf>